Impact of influenza, herpes zoster, and pneumococcal vaccinations on the incidence of cardiovascular events in subjects aged over 65 years: a systematic review.

This systematic review aims to summarize the impact of vaccination against influenza, shingles, and pneumococcus on the incidence on the risk of cardiovascular events in the elderly. This protocol was developed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We conducted a literature search and identified all relevant articles published regarding the matter up to September 2022. We retrieved 38 studies (influenza vaccine = 33, pneumococcal vaccine = 5, and zoster vaccine = 2). A total of 28 and 2 studies have shown that influenza and pneumococcal vaccines significantly lower the risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Also, repeated influenza vaccination shows a consistent and dose-dependent protective effect against acute coronary syndromes and stroke. Moreover, dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination was associated with lower risks of some cardiovascular events (stroke, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and myocardial infarction). However, the impact of PCV13 on cardiovascular events has not been studied, nor has the currently recommended vaccination schedule (PCV13 + PPV23). As for herpes zoster vaccination, only the protective effect against stroke has been studied with the live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine, but no studies have been conducted with the recombinant subunit herpes zoster vaccine. This review outlines the benefits of the vaccines mentioned above beyond their preventive action on infectious diseases. It is intended for health professionals who wish to inform and advise their elderly patients.

Prevalence of Giant Cell Arteritis Relapse in Patients Treated With Glucocorticoids: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The relapse rate of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone varied widely in observational series and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of relapse and predisposing factors in patients receiving GCs alone. METHODS: We searched Medline up to December 2017. The prevalence of relapse was pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies (2,505 patients), comprising 8 RCTs, were included. The overall prevalence of relapse was 47.2% (95% confidence interval 40.0, 54.3) with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%). Prevalence of relapse was significantly higher for patients included in an RCT compared to those included in an observational study (P < 0.0001), but was not significantly different according to design (P = 0.06). The relapse rate was associated with year of publication (34 studies, rate increase of 8.3% for 1 decade; P < 0.0001) and with shorter GC regimens (17 studies, rate decrease of 1.7% for 1 additional month; P < 0.001), the duration of scheduled GC therapy being shorter in RCTs (12.8 months) compared to observational studies (28.8 months). The effective duration of GC therapy (P = 0.23), initial GC dose (P = 0.49), duration of follow-up (P = 0.14), sex (P = 0.29), and age (P = 0.43) were not associated with the prevalence of relapse. CONCLUSION: GCA relapses occur in half of patients and without improvement across decades in patients receiving GC alone, and the relapse rate is more related to short duration of GC administration than to the initial dose at induction. These results advocate for trial design with at least 12 months of GC therapy.